Justice Denied?

Or justice not settled. Whichever way you define it, it seems to me that if a kid did start one of the California fires, either one is better than ever claiming "justice well served," and how can it be? How can the punishments most equitable to the pain of the victims of that fire be given to a child? Even a fraction of that punishment might be seen as injustice due to the age and assumed mental capabilities of most children. This is a truly asinine situation. Nothing uncruel can be done to that child and his family and still be a fit punishment for the crime, because if it fits the crime, it must be cruel.
http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5hzNKToSBGU9gikCAGXs4-ePFG2FAD8SK5SN80

The circumstances alone reason for some mercy, but, still, it's highly ridiculous.

I swear, anyone who says,"but he's just a kid should," be punched upside the head. We know "he's just a kid". Just let some of us complain.